Despite early exit, Leggett still confident in program's future

Clemson's NCAA Regional Tournament game against Xavier at Vanderbilt University's Hawkins Field  in Nashville - Bradley LeCroy & Jack Leggett

Clemson's NCAA Regional Tournament game against Xavier at Vanderbilt University's Hawkins Field in Nashville - Bradley LeCroy & Jack Leggett

NASHVILLE, Tenn. – Jack Leggett never quite had a feel in year No. 21 as Clemson’s head coach.

A preseason top-15 team, characteristic of ample inconsistency – his Tigers (36-25) had their longest winning streaks (6, twice) and losing streaks (4, twice) back-to-back early and then mid-season.

On the brink of missing the NCAA Tournament, Clemson finished the regular season 9-3, rallying in the season finale over Boston College to stay on the bubble.

“I feel like we kind of underachieved,” Clemson ace right-hander Daniel Gossett said. “I felt like we were always really close. We were always right on the brink and it just never happened. It’s disappointing to see a team with so much talent and we’re out after two games in a regional.

“You’d like to think that the season up to the regional – as long as you get in, it doesn’t matter…We just weren’t able to turn it on at the right time.”

Leggett answers for 'little disappointing' season

None

Taking two in the ACC Tournament – a win over No. 6 Miami sealed the deal on the Music City trip over the weekend, but as the competition-level and stakes increased, Clemson’s numbers show a bit of a nosedive.

Hitting over .300 as a team going into the South Carolina series, their line steadily declined – finishing with a .274 mark at the plate. Against Baseball America top-25 teams, the Tigers averaged 3.2 runs per game, going 3-10.

Clemson averaged 3.3 per game in the postseason (giving up 6.4), which culminated in a 24-5 two-and-out scoring rout delivered by Oregon and Xavier.

The Tigers dropped to 5-10 in NCAA Tourney games since being 27 outs from a CWS title-game appearance in 2010, going 0-5 against teams seeded 1 or 2 in the regional round.

While the early exit stings, Leggett says it’s similar feeling to any season without a championship.

“I’m just a little disappointed that we never really put it all together,” Leggett said. “We never had enough players playing in a rhythm at the same time. Had different things happen to us during the course of the year…It was a combination of everything. As we closed the season, it wasn’t something that jumped out to me every single day.

“I’m hoping the experience of this and motivation of this will be something that will turn into something positive next year.”

The 2015 outlook could depend on this week’s MLB Draft, starting Thursday.

Gossett is expected to go in the first three rounds, while sophomore No. 2 starter Matthew Crownover and catcher Garrett Boulware could join him as potential pros. One Clemson signee is potential first-round pick (infielder Michael Chavis) and another a top-100 prospect (pitcher Austin DeCarr).

With second baseman Steve Wilkerson’s four-year run over, the Tigers lose their 2014 leader in doubles (18), homers (6) and RBI (42). Boulware, a Hanna product, hit over .300 for a second-straight season (.302), totaling 35 RBIs and 20 extra-base hits.

Clemson’s main freshmen contributors both suffered a late-season swoon. Okey nearly led the team wire-to-wire in RBI (41), compiling 20 in his first 16 games before knocking in just two in his final 16. Third baseman Weston Wilson was hitless in his final three contests and 1-for-13 in postseason play.

Outside of Gossett and possibly Crownover, Clemson’s biggest pitching loss is closer Matt Campbell (8 saves/0.84 ERA in 25 appearances).

Regardless of circumstances faced currently or in the near future, the Tigers hall of fame coach is confident the arrow is pointing up.

“I haven’t lost any confidence in anything we do,” said Leggett. “Everybody looks at our program on the outside looking in – five percent of the fanbase is always unhappy about something. The people that know what our baseball program is all about – the people on the outside, those that know college baseball – know that Clemson has a strong, traditional prideful baseball program.”

Meanwhile, Leggett waits to see if Clemson’s athletic administration agrees, meeting with AD Dan Radakovich later this week.

“Well, I hope so,” he said, pausing before repeating, “I hope so.”

"This baseball season did not end as we all had hoped," Radakovich said in a statement Sunday. "I will be speaking with Jack in the next few days to talk about the path ahead for our program. While we again advanced to the NCAA tournament, we can and will look to do more."

© 2014 OrangeAndWhite.com. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

  • Discuss
  • Print

Comments » 9

TigerNE writes:

I keep reading his comment about being on the outside looking in. And I'm finding 8t hard to not find it insulting to fans and supporters. It's as if he wants us to be quiet simply because we aren't a part of the team or staff.

fasttiger44#293363 writes:

in response to TigerNE:

I keep reading his comment about being on the outside looking in. And I'm finding 8t hard to not find it insulting to fans and supporters. It's as if he wants us to be quiet simply because we aren't a part of the team or staff.

I get that same feeling. I promise you there are far more than 5% that are dissatisfied with what's going on with the baseball program.

michtiger writes:

in a season of consistency,poor fielding, poor hitting and player disappointments why would anyone believe the draft, other than Gossett and maybe an incoming freshmen is a real factor. Boulware certainly did not show mlb potential and almost all our hot shot young players except Krieger, who is a liability in the field fell on their swords. This looked like a play it out team and that is a coaching problem. Notice every time we had a PH they were mostly below 200. My concern is we have no proven talent for next year and the poor develop Jack did with the younger players and their collapse begs for a change at coaching.

35802tiger writes:

I believe if there were a poll of Clemson fans Jack would be job hunting tomorrow. It seems to me that Jack feels that he is entitled to continue coaching based on past accomplishments. In the post-regional press conference he seemed to resent the question of his returning next year. In my opinion he is arrogant, egotistical, and stubborn. I don't believe he will leave on his own and I fear the downward spiral will continue.

33dtb writes:

All the good assistants are gone to other schools and one could suspect that Leggett has gone "t, bowden" and is hiring assistants that would not be a threat to his job.............. still can't figure how Dabbo snuck in under the radar ......

33dtb writes:

..."Leggett has two years left on his contract that pays him $400,000 per year in base and supplemental salary (before incentives). Firing Leggett immediately after the 2014 season would cost Clemson a buyout of roughly $416,666, essentially costing the athletic department one year's salary to usher in Clemson's third head coach since 1957.".......

http://www.shakinthesouthland.com/201...

fasttiger44#293363 writes:

I think losing a couple of big time assistant coaches has hurt the team quite a lot. He may be wise to find a couple of top notch guys to help him teach those guys how to play because it was clear over the weekend they looked like a little league team.

kellytown writes:

in response to 35802tiger:

I believe if there were a poll of Clemson fans Jack would be job hunting tomorrow. It seems to me that Jack feels that he is entitled to continue coaching based on past accomplishments. In the post-regional press conference he seemed to resent the question of his returning next year. In my opinion he is arrogant, egotistical, and stubborn. I don't believe he will leave on his own and I fear the downward spiral will continue.

I agree with your comment 100%. Jacks time as Head coach has passed some time ago. We have lost assistant coaches that we should have kept and parted ways with jack. Clemson needs a new head coach. Jack has lost the team!!

33dtb writes:

in response to kellytown:

I agree with your comment 100%. Jacks time as Head coach has passed some time ago. We have lost assistant coaches that we should have kept and parted ways with jack. Clemson needs a new head coach. Jack has lost the team!!

kinda puts one in mind of our "late / great" football coach that has since flunked out of color commentary.........we should have kept Rich Rod.

Share your thoughts

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Comments can be shared on Facebook and Yahoo!. Add both options by connecting your profiles.

Features