Legislative proposal could help fast-track Clemson athletic facilities projects

University officials recently pitched the Clemson University Enterprise Act to South Carolina legislators

Clemson University students walk across campus.

Photo by Sefton Ipock

Clemson University students walk across campus.

COLUMBIA, S.C. — Clemson University officials want freer hands to run those programs not directly tied to educating undergraduates and graduates.

University officials recently pitched the Clemson University Enterprise Act to South Carolina legislators. The bill would shift oversight of activities such as economic development, new athletics and housing construction and research projects away from state regulatory agencies — including the Budget and Control Board — and put them under the control of a proposed “enterprise division” that would answer to the university’s board of trustees.

There would also be annual reports to the governor’s office as well as the heads of the House Ways and Means and Senate Finance committees.

“Over the last five to seven years, we have been working with other higher educational institutions to seek greater regulatory relief; we want the opportunity to do more,” said Angie Leidinger, Clemson’s government affairs director.

“We’re hoping to move procurement, human resources and capital planning at a faster pace,” said Leidinger, who cited the Clemson University International Center for Automotive Research as one initiative that could benefit from greater university autonomy over planning and spending.

Republican Sen. Larry Martin of Pickens agreed with Leidinger’s characterizations,

“We want to do some things for the university so they spend a little bit less time jumping through hoops,” said Martin, who blamed a six-month delay in completing the university’s privately-financed indoor football practice facility on the state’s bureaucratic red tape.

Another co-sponsor of the bill, freshman Sen. Ross Turner, appreciates for the university’s frustration with the slow pace of state bureaucracy.

“I understand the need for them to be able to make decisions without waiting for two months,” said the Greenville Republican.

Leidinger denied the measure is an end run around the Budget and Control Board — comprised of the governor, the state’s treasurer and comptroller and chairmen of the Senate Finance and House Ways and Means committees — which has final say over most spending and procurement issues for institutions such as Clemson, the University of South Carolina and the state’s technical colleges.

Martin said the university’s board of trustees would remain accountable to the public and the General Assembly, and stressed that the university’s undergraduate education programs will still be governed by existing state rules.

Leidinger added that the Medical University of South Carolina in Charleston has used a similar framework for more than a decade for programs that don’t grant degrees.

“This is aimed at those enterprises that don’t target the undergraduate mission,” Leidinger emphasized.

The measure is sponsored by Senate Majority Leader Harvey Peeler, a Gaffney Republican and 1970 Clemson graduate. Eight Republican and eight Democratic senators are co-sponsoring the bill, including Democrat Vince Sheheen, a former gubernatorial candidate and 1993 Clemson graduate The measure now sits before the Senate Finance Committee.

Martin wonders if there is enough time left for passage in the final two months of the ongoing session.

“I get the sense that the university would like to get it passed this session,” said Martin, whose three children have attended Clemson.

© 2013 OrangeAndWhite.com. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

  • Discuss
  • Print

Comments » 2

rsb4728#285989 writes:

After reading the article titled,"the Clemson University Enterprise Act", I feel dumber than I did before I read the article.I have been under the impression that monies spent on athletic facilities and the such was provided by the Clemson Athletic Department thru football ticktet sales and IPTAY. Maybe they get some funding thru the state which would make my ranting moot. At any rate, common sense says if the State does not provide any money towards a project, they should not be involved with it in any way, shape or form. Clemson can spend it's own money on whatever they choose to and should not have to get permission from anybody in the legislature. It just doesn't make any sense at all.

KerryCapps writes:

My understanding is that any project at a state university has to pass through the S.C. Budget and Control Board, regardless of the source of funding. This has been a sore point with college administrators for as long as I can remember. There is, needless to say, much red tape and hoops to jump through before reaching approval. Most recently, beginning of construction on Clemson's indoor football practice facility was delayed several months after everything appeared to be in place to begin the project.

Share your thoughts

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Comments can be shared on Facebook and Yahoo!. Add both options by connecting your profiles.

Features