Brownell using missing, watching NCAA Tourney as learning tool

Clemson head coach Brad Brownell gathers his team during a time out in the second half.

Photo by Nathan Gray

Clemson head coach Brad Brownell gathers his team during a time out in the second half.

Brad Brownell's team didn't make it on a bracket nor did he fill out one, but he will be watching the NCAA Tournament intently this month.

“Some guys go home when they’re not watching film of their opponent – they just get away from it,” Brownell said. “I don’t do that very much. I’m a guy that likes to learn things. I like to see things. I like to watch the way other guys do things.

“So I’ll watch as much as I can.”

Aiming for a return to the madness in 2013-14, he said two teams he will especially keep an eye on for ideas are a pair of 6-seeds – Arizona in the West Region and Butler in the East.

“Arizona does some things we do,” said Brownell. “We did things more like Butler this year with set screens and the ball-screen stuff. (Butler coach) Brad Stevens and I got together this summer and spent a day together. We’ve done some stuff like they would do.”

Brownell reevaluating offense

None

All four ACC teams that made the tourney are favored to move on to the next round, in 2-seeds Miami (East) and Duke (Midwest) and 8-seeds UNC (South) and N.C. State (East).

Not being able to join them for a second-straight year is something that will bother Brownell throughout the tournament and offseason after.

“It’s my first losing season,” he said, “so it’ll probably stick with me for a long time and that’s probably good. I don’t need to be excited about what we did.

“I don’t need to feel this is acceptable. We better figure out how to change it.”

With the exit of senior big men Milton Jennings and Devin Booker, also gone just like that will be any Tigers with NCAA Tournament experience off a team that made it to the round of 64 four-straight years from 2007-2011.

Leadership on the court, which Brownell admits lacked this season, is the key moving forward.

“That’s a question that will be answered by the players,” Brownell said, “and it better come from the players because I don’t think it did this year. That was a part of our problem. That’s why you see a team do what it did.

“There’s no clear direction…When a team is coach-directed, it’s never as good as if it’s player-directed.”

With no seniors on the team next season, Brownell isn’t sure who will step into that role.

“Maybe K.J. (McDaniels). Maybe Rod Hall,” he said. “Those are two guys that have played a lot and have experience. You’d expect them to play next year so they’ll have voices. I don’t know if a Jordan Roper is ready to do that. Maybe, maybe not. But the players have to figure that out.”

© 2013 OrangeAndWhite.com. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

  • Discuss
  • Print

Related Topics

Comments » 3

SoCalTiger writes:

It scares me when the coach says that there's "no clear direction", or he "isn't sure". Isn't it the coach's job to provide direction and to be sure? He's throwing it on the players, who are still young and untested, for the most part. Isn't it up to the coach to identify players who have leadership qualities and label them as leaders? The players are supposed to look to the coach for answers and this coach is waiting to get answers from the players. That's a head scratcher.

SlappleDapple writes:

in response to SoCalTiger:

It scares me when the coach says that there's "no clear direction", or he "isn't sure". Isn't it the coach's job to provide direction and to be sure? He's throwing it on the players, who are still young and untested, for the most part. Isn't it up to the coach to identify players who have leadership qualities and label them as leaders? The players are supposed to look to the coach for answers and this coach is waiting to get answers from the players. That's a head scratcher.

@SoCalTiger - BB's comments make perfect sense. Read up on the SLU Billikens and Coach Crews, one of the four finalists for NCOY. He says the same things about a player-directed vs coach-directed team. Clemson had 2 seniors, who really only added up to 1 consistent player and zero leaders. Addition by subtraction is the theme for next year.

SoCalTiger writes:

in response to SlappleDapple:

@SoCalTiger - BB's comments make perfect sense. Read up on the SLU Billikens and Coach Crews, one of the four finalists for NCOY. He says the same things about a player-directed vs coach-directed team. Clemson had 2 seniors, who really only added up to 1 consistent player and zero leaders. Addition by subtraction is the theme for next year.

I see your point. Crews did very well at University of Evansville taking them to the 1st and 2nd rounds of the NCAA's. They won the MCC championship and he was that league's coach of the year. But he had a losing record at Army. He is a great coach, but this is the ACC, not MCC or the MVC. Brownell was a great coach in a lesser league as well. I'm not convinced that approach will work in the ACC, especially considering the teams that are coming into the league. It hasn't so far for Brownell in the ACC.

Share your thoughts

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Comments can be shared on Facebook and Yahoo!. Add both options by connecting your profiles.

Features