As expected the 2012-13 Clemson men’s basketball campaign ended noisily but quickly in Greensboro, N.C., with the Tigers falling to Florida State for the third time in just over two months.
The stat sheet reads 13-18 overall, and you can add one more Atlantic Coast Conference loss to the 5-13 mark the team registered during the regular season.
This will not be a year that will inspire books to be written and tributes to be paid.
It was the first losing season at Clemson since the 2003-04 team went 10-18 and marked yet another step backward, record-wise, for Brad Brownell.
In his first year at the helm the Tigers finished 22-12 and made it to the First Four in Dayton, while last season the club dropped to 16-15 and exited in the first round of the ACC Tournament.
The decline has been more of a slip than a landslide and no one is questioning Brownell’s coaching acumen. He has, after all, taken three different teams to the NCAA Tournament.
But there is cause for concern — not just for fans of Tiger basketball but for Brownell himself.
There’s a relatively new sheriff in town, and he is demonstrating a willingness to make changes when he thinks changes need to be made.
Dan Radakovich has been the director of athletics at Clemson since Oct. 29, 2012, meaning he is still fresh enough in the job to sit back and observe things for a while.
Sitting back and observing is obviously not his style.
When Radakovich found out back in January the Clemson track and field program was guilty of NCAA violations,director of track and field Lawrence Johnson resigned.
And earlier this month he fired women’s basketball coach Itoro Coleman after three years of futility.
Although a former star at her alma mater and well-liked, Coleman’s teams were 25-63 overall and 10-38 in the ACC. Throw in the fact that the team couldn’t draw flies to Littlejohn Coliseum, and Radakovich decided he had to go in another direction.
Which brings us back to Brownell, who could certainly be forgiven for looking over his shoulder once the 2013-14 season gets under way.
Four years are about as long as a coach can hope to get to make it "his" team, and Brownell’s youngsters will have to do some serious growing up between now and the start of practice in October.
"Obviously the fact that our guys are competing helps because we’re going to practice every day and working at it and really trying," Brownell said. "We just have some deficiencies that we have to improve. Until we do that this is going to be the outcome."
With the loss the in the ACC Tournament Clemson lost their only two seniors, who accounted for 2,004 points, 1,247 rebounds and 5,722 minutes played.
Also expected to be gone for the immediate future is Damarcus Harrison, who is scheduled to embark on a two-year Mormon mission.
Back are some good ones — guys like K.J. McDaniels, Jordan Roper and Rod Hall, just to name three. And there will be some new faces in the lineup that are expected to provide a quick boost.
But they’ll enter a new-look ACC, one that will now include the likes of Syracuse, Pitt and Notre Dame — and soon add Louisville.
The schedule will only get harder and the obstacles more pronounced.
No doubt next season will be one ion which Brownell’s wiggle room will have shrunk dramatically.
"We have a scholarship left, we’re going to get out on the road as quick as possible and try and fill that and the guys we have coming back we’ve got to work to get ‘em better, simple as that," Brownell said. "We need to get in the gym and improve our offensive skills so we can make more plays, finish plays, become a better offensive team."



Scripps Interactive Newspapers Group
Comments » 4
waran writes:
The 1st lesson to learn is the "determination to win". When Roper missed an easy dunk at the Tournament, he had a cute smile on his face. Hall is good in moving the ball but rarely shows leadership in trying to score. KJ is the only player that we can build on and all other slots are open to competition.
michtiger writes:
contrary to the article there are people questioning Brads coaching skills. FSU tried twice to give us the 1st rd. game, first 15 min. they did nothing and at the end they imploded and we could not muster a run. why wait another year. McDaniels is real. roper has a good stroke but will need to mature. Hall really did not grow in his role. filler will help and sullivan can add relief. Nnon is not a factor. That does not make a team. when is the last time we had hit the floor Fr. and from the above review, 2!! So next year could be very bad. why not now to start new. All 3 seasons have been worse. sorry we need to get ACC coaching because nexts years schedule will run us off the court.
HoopsMan writes:
We had ACC caliber with the previous staff. AND we could have had Shane Larkin playig for us instead of Miami. But TDP wanted to hire some young no name coach who had half the resume than any of the assistants had who were here with OP. Check the creds on any of the former coaches - Smart, Bradley are the top two. They both have resumes that are outstanding and Bradley has more experience as a coach and a player than any current coach out there. He is old but if we want to win we need to look past age. The fact that he built the program when he was here for 7 years with Purnell should count for alot as well. Bring him in for 2 or 3 years and see what happens. We have tried to get Shaka but he wont leave VCU. I dont blame him either with the support he has there. Brownell has done well where he was but he cannot recruit the players we need and he definitely cant coach to the level that need to win. Side note -- Bradley as the head coach of Radford University is the winningest coach in school history and the conference. He was inducted into their hall of fame just after TDP decided not to hire him. Smart move -- dont hire the guy who is the winningest coach in a program and conference. Tell the new AD Dan R he needs to look at track records when he goes to get a new men's coach!
SoCalTiger writes:
I think that any college basketball coach who is not already known as a winner or a successful program builder is going to have a hard time convincing any highly recruited players to play at Clemson. I think OP realized this and, even though he is struggling with wins and losses at DePaul, he has better players there. Brownell, to me, this season, seemed to make excuses before each game, laying the groundwork for losses with his words. He seems to be in over his head. I have seen him yell at the players, in their faces, many times. If Brownell is that type of coach, then the results should be evident. They are not. SC coach Frank Martin does that too, but I suspect that Martin will have that other school's team competing in each game before too long. (Please don't label me a secret Lamecock fan) Look at how Miami and NC State turned things around in just two years. Duke and UNC simply reload and contend every year. I have been watching Clemson hoops since Tree Rollins and I believe that the only long term fix for this program is to open the checkbook and hire a big name coach who can convince elite players to come play at Littlejohn. With Syracuse, Pittsburgh and Louisville (all going to the dance) coming soon, Clemson needs to rebuild starting now. There is no place else but up and there couldn't be a better time for change. I think Brownell is a good coach, but the results show clearly that he is not effective in the ACC. Defense may win football games, but not in basketball. No offense to coach Brownell.
Share your thoughts
Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.